Why it may be worth watching
- The Twilight Zone combines Sci-Fi & Fantasy and Mystery storytelling.
- The principal cast includes Forest Whitaker.
- Viewers currently rate it 7.2/10 from 126 votes.
TV series
Check your reality at the door.
A 2002 revival of Rod Serling's 1950/60s television series, The Twilight Zone, with actor Forest Whitaker assuming Serling's role as narrator and on-screen host.
More detailsEpisodes
People
Viewing guide
Best suited to viewers looking for Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Mystery, Drama. The available catalogue spans 1 season.
A regional age classification is not currently listed. Metadata signals include frightening or intense material. Ratings vary by country; use this as a quick screening note rather than a complete parental guide.
Viewing guidance uses the title details shown on this page; classifications may differ by region.
Community
Well.... something went wrong here didn't it?
I mean the formula was there, the cast was certainly there, Forrest Whitaker did a great job... and you do sort of believe he was really into it when you watch it, like more than a host, more like a fan who's dream of being Serling came true sort of got into it.
So what happened?
Unfortunately the story kind of happened. The original series, and the 80s revival had the quality you would expect, but by the naught's revival it fizzled out through lack of decent story. The plot turns you saw coming a m…
Well.... something went wrong here didn't it?
I mean the formula was there, the cast was certainly there, Forrest Whitaker did a great job... and you do sort of believe he was really into it when you watch it, like more than a host, more like a fan who's dream of being Serling came true sort of got into it.
So what happened?
Unfortunately the story kind of happened. The original series, and the 80s revival had the quality you would expect, but by the naught's revival it fizzled out through lack of decent story. The plot turns you saw coming a mile away, even when they weren't playing to the tropes of the genre, it all seemed predictable.
And then, it was cheap. When the 80s version, almost 20 years, almost two full decades removed looked better, you are left with a cheap feeling, a feeling that they were relying on the name and the casting to pull it through in the ratings and didn't feel the need to properly fund it at all.
So in the end, you have a poor showing with a great cast.
Log in to write a review.